<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UpGRD me &#187; Opinion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.upgrd.me/category/opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.upgrd.me</link>
	<description>Helping to make your life better since 2009</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:40:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is It Really The End For Nokia?</title>
		<link>http://www.upgrd.me/2009/07/is-it-really-the-end-for-nokia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.upgrd.me/2009/07/is-it-really-the-end-for-nokia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>krishna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgrd.me/?p=1232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the last few months some very respectable tech blogs that are frequently quoted on UpGRD.me, have called it the end for Nokia.  Gizmodo said &#8220;Nokia Is Doomed&#8221; not once, not twice, but three times after publishing its N97 review. Engadget published a very creative, but somewhat negative review on the N97.  And TechCrunch gave the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the last few months some very respectable tech blogs that are frequently quoted on UpGRD.me, have called it the end for Nokia.  Gizmodo said &#8220;<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5308440/nokia-n97-review-nokia-is-doomed">Nokia Is Doomed</a>&#8221; not once, not <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309470/analysts-say-nokia-really-is-doomed-by-2013-apple-to-pass-it-in-2011">twice</a>, but <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5315929/nokia-is-doomed-pt-iii-profits-plummet-by-two-thirds">three times</a> after publishing its N97 review. Engadget published a very creative, but <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/22/nokia-n97-review-a-tale-of-two-bloggers/">somewhat negative review</a> on the N97.  And TechCrunch gave the N97 a <a href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/07/09/review-nokia-n97-so-close-yet-so-so-far/">less than stellar</a> review too.  While Nokia&#8217;s profits have dropped <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/technology/companies/17phone.html?_r=1&amp;scp=2&amp;sq=nokia&amp;st=cse">substantially</a>, and it forecasts have been slashed, is this really the end the the world largest cell-phone manufacturer?</p>
<p><span id="more-1232"></span></p>
<p>Sure, the Finnish giant&#8217;s handsets are somewhat inconsequential in the U.S. and are taking a beating from Apple and RIM in the smartphone market but lets take a minute to remind ourselves that Nokia is still, by far, the largest manufacturer and <a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=985912">seller of mobile phone handsets</a> in both the smartphone and non-smartphone category.  And though the vast majority of its sales come from selling low-cost, non-smartphone handsets, Nokia/Symbian still owns 49.3% of the smartphone market (although this number is declining).  Analysts and bloggers tout the incredible growth of smartpones year-over-year, but it is key to remember smartphones are not for everyone.  While the global share of smartphones may rise from the current 13.5% to even 30%-40% in the years to come, Nokia still dominates the market when it comes to making easy-to-use, low-cost phones that just work.  The first phone that I used was a Nokia.  And it is the the only phones that several technophobes in my family use.  Ultimately, nothing beats a Nokia candy-bar handset for simplicity and ease of use and not everyone needs a smartphone.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 286px"><img class=" " src="http://www.cyberindian.net/wp-content/uploads/nokia-3110-classic.jpg" alt="Nokia 3110" width="276" height="328" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nokia 3110</p></div>
<p>The problem with Nokia&#8217;s smartphone strategy right now is its  S60 5th Edition OS.  It is not optimized for touchscreens and the new-generation of e-mailers, tweeters and media-consumers.  It is, however, still vastly superior to any Windows Mobile handset available (even those with an &#8220;optimized&#8221;  UI &#8211; aka  TouchFlow 3D).   And if companies like Palm can make a potential comeback (whether the Pre/WebOS will be Palm&#8217;s savior or not is still undecided), I&#8217;m certain Nokia can pull itself out of the water.  The company just needs to be careful that it doesn&#8217;t go the path of Motorola in years to come.</p>
<p>Finally, I&#8217;d be remiss if I didn&#8217;t  mention the  decent amount of buzz surrounding the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302612/nokia-e72-hands-on-like-e71-but-more-better/gallery/">E72 business handset</a> that is to be release shortly, and if Nokia can hit the $99 sweet-spot, it may very-well have a hit on its hands in the US.  And if the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5308164/report-nokia-commences-mating-dance-with-android-handset-due-in-september-updated">rumors are true</a>, given the years of experience under its belt, I&#8217;m certain Nokia can put out an Android-based handset to match the <a href="http://www.upgrd.me/2009/07/reviews-are-streaming-in-for-the-htc-hero/">very well reviewed HTC Hero</a>.  All said and done, I can see how it is tempting to write-off the Finnish giant, but even the venerable Apple, Inc. has had its tombstone carved out prematurely once or twice before.</p>
<p><em>Krishna is a guest-blogger on UpGRD.me.  He can be found at <a href="http://www.krishnasrinivasan.com">www.krishnasrinivasan.com</a><br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.upgrd.me/2009/07/is-it-really-the-end-for-nokia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Explorer 6 Just Needs To Die</title>
		<link>http://www.upgrd.me/2009/07/internet-explorer-6-just-needs-to-die/</link>
		<comments>http://www.upgrd.me/2009/07/internet-explorer-6-just-needs-to-die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Saurabh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgrd.me/?p=1162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Internet Explorer 6 has been around since August of 2001, making it 8 years old in a couple of weeks. EIGHT YEARS! To give some perspective on just how old that is: IE6 came out 4 years before YouTube was introduced. IE6 came out 3 years before BitTorrent was even invented. IE6 came out 3 years before [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.upgrd.me/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/internet_explorer.gif" rel="lightbox[1162]"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1163" title="internet_explorer" src="http://www.upgrd.me/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/internet_explorer.gif" alt="internet_explorer" width="200" height="200" /></a></p>
<p>Internet Explorer 6 has been around since August of 2001, making it 8 years old in a couple of weeks. EIGHT YEARS! To give some perspective on just how old that is: IE6 came out 4 years before YouTube was introduced. IE6 came out 3 years before BitTorrent was even invented. IE6 came out 3 years before Gmail was introduced. IE6 came out when Google was just a small search engine that had a cult following. So why are people still using such a relic of a browser? Why are companies enforcing their employees on using such a crippled and insecure application? It just makes no sense anymore. I had such a hard time getting UpGRD me to render correctly with some friends who still used IE6 at work. And it seems that I am not the only one. Both Digg and YouTube are tired of spending time, money, and resources on maintaining compatibility of all their site&#8217;s functionality with IE6. They have both independently announced that the will be phasing out support for IE6. YouTube has put up a banner above the videos with this announcement while Digg is thinking about preventing people with IE6 from digging or commenting on stories (IE6 only accounts for 1% of site activity). Someone needs to make a stand on this (*hint*Google*hint*), and finally bury this archaic browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.upgrd.me/2009/07/internet-explorer-6-just-needs-to-die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
